DJI Blog
X-Plane 12 vs MSFS 2024: Which Simulator Works Best with Hardware Panels?
X-Plane 12 vs MSFS 2024: Which Simulator Works Best with Hardware Panels?
Two world-class simulators, one home cockpit. Here's how X-Plane 12 and Microsoft Flight Simulator 2024 compare for hardware panel integration.
Introduction
If you're investing in dedicated flight simulation hardware, the choice of simulator platform matters. While your MCP, FCU, or CDU will physically work with either simulator, the experience of using them—the setup complexity, aircraft support, and day-to-day reliability—varies significantly.
This guide provides an honest, practical comparison of X-Plane 12 and Microsoft Flight Simulator 2024 from a hardware user's perspective. We'll cover everything from initial configuration to long-term usability, helping you choose the platform that best fits your cockpit setup.
Platform Overview
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2024
Released: November 2024
Developer: Asobo Studio / Microsoft
Engine: Proprietary (updated from MSFS 2020)
Strengths:
- Stunning visual fidelity
- Real-world weather and traffic integration
- Strong third-party aircraft ecosystem
- Native SimConnect SDK for hardware
- Large, active community
Considerations:
- Requires constant internet connection
- Higher system requirements
- Marketplace-centric add-on distribution
X-Plane 12
Released: September 2022
Developer: Laminar Research
Engine: Blade Element Theory flight model
Strengths:
- Superior flight dynamics
- Open architecture for modifications
- Works fully offline
- Lower system requirements
- Free Zibo 737 add-on
Considerations:
- Less visually impressive scenery
- Smaller third-party ecosystem
- More technical user base
Hardware Integration: Head-to-Head
Native USB HID Support
Both simulators recognize standard USB HID devices, but implementation differs.
MSFS 2024:
- Automatic device detection on launch
- Hot-plug support (connect during flight)
- Built-in control mapping interface
- Profile system for different setups
X-Plane 12:
- Device detection on startup
- Limited hot-plug capability
- Joystick configuration screen
- Plugin-based advanced mapping
Winner: MSFS 2024
MSFS offers smoother plug-and-play experience. Devices are recognized faster and hot-swapping works reliably.
SDK and Developer Tools
The depth of SDK determines how well aircraft add-ons can integrate hardware.
MSFS 2024 SimConnect:
- Comprehensive variable access
- Event-based communication
- Low-latency input handling
- Well-documented API
- WASM module support
X-Plane 12 SDK:
- DataRef system for variables
- Command system for inputs
- Plugin architecture
- Open-source community tools
- Direct memory access possible
Winner: Tie
Both offer excellent SDK capabilities. MSFS is better documented; X-Plane is more open and hackable.
Third-Party Middleware
Sometimes you need tools beyond native support.
MSFS Options:
- FSUIPC 7 — Industry standard, excellent support
- MobiFlight — Free, open-source, active development
- Axis and Ohs — Modern alternative with scripting
- SPAD.neXt — Professional-grade, subscription model
X-Plane Options:
- FlyWithLua — Free scripting plugin
- AirTrack — Hardware interface tool
- SimVim — DIY cockpit framework
- XPConnect — FSUIPC-like functionality
Winner: MSFS 2024
The MSFS middleware ecosystem is more mature, with better documentation and commercial support options.
Boeing 737 Hardware Experience
The 737 is the most popular type for home cockpits. Let's compare the experience.
PMDG 737 (MSFS 2024)
Price: ~$75 per variant
Hardware Support: ★★★★★
The PMDG 737 sets the standard for hardware integration:
- Dedicated hardware mode in aircraft settings
- Pre-built profiles for popular panels
- PMDG Operations Center for configuration
- Direct SDK access for panel manufacturers
- Motorized throttle support for autothrottle
MCP/EFIS Configuration:
- Enable Hardware Mode in PMDG settings
- Load CS 737X profile (provided)
- Fly—everything works automatically
CDU Integration:
- Hardware CDU mode displays FMC directly
- No virtual popup needed
- Full functionality including ACARS
Throttle Quadrant:
- Native motorized throttle support
- Autothrottle moves physical levers
- Proper detent recognition
Zibo 737-800 (X-Plane 12)
Price: Free (donation appreciated)
Hardware Support: ★★★★☆
The Zibo mod offers remarkable hardware support for a free add-on:
- Built-in hardware configuration menu
- DataRef-based control mapping
- Community profiles available
- Active developer support
- Frequent updates
MCP/EFIS Configuration:
- Open Zibo hardware settings
- Map each control to DataRef
- Test and adjust sensitivity
CDU Integration:
- Works via plugin interface
- Requires additional configuration
- Full FMC functionality available
Throttle Quadrant:
- Motorized support via plugins
- Requires FlyWithLua scripts
- Community solutions available
Comparison Table
| Feature | PMDG 737 (MSFS) | Zibo 737 (X-Plane) |
|---|---|---|
| Initial setup | 5 minutes | 30-60 minutes |
| Profile availability | Official profiles | Community profiles |
| MCP support | Native | DataRef mapping |
| CDU integration | Seamless | Plugin-based |
| Motorized throttle | Native | Script-based |
| Documentation | Comprehensive | Community wiki |
| Update frequency | Monthly | Weekly |
| Cost | $75 | Free |
Winner: PMDG 737 for ease of use, Zibo for value
Airbus A320 Hardware Experience
Fenix A320 (MSFS 2024)
Price: ~$70
Hardware Support: ★★★★★
Fenix delivers excellent hardware integration:
- EFB hardware settings panel
- Automatic panel detection
- Native FCU support
- MCDU hardware mode
- Growing feature set
FCU Configuration:
- Enable External Hardware in EFB
- Select detected panels
- Configure any custom mappings
MCDU Integration:
- Dedicated hardware MCDU mode
- Screen output to physical display
- Full FMGC functionality
ToLiss A321 (X-Plane 12)
Price: ~$75
Hardware Support: ★★★★☆
ToLiss offers solid hardware support:
- Plugin-based configuration
- DataRef mapping for controls
- ISCS integration available
- Good community support
- Mature, stable product
FCU Configuration:
- Access hardware settings via plugin
- Map DataRefs to panel controls
- Test each function
MCDU Integration:
- Requires additional plugins
- Works via network connection
- Full functionality available
Comparison Table
| Feature | Fenix A320 (MSFS) | ToLiss A321 (X-Plane) |
|---|---|---|
| Initial setup | 10 minutes | 45-60 minutes |
| FCU support | Native detection | DataRef mapping |
| MCDU integration | Built-in | Plugin-based |
| Profile system | Yes | Community-based |
| Documentation | Good | Wiki-based |
| EFB integration | Excellent | Good |
Winner: Fenix A320 for integration, ToLiss for flight model
Configuration Complexity Comparison
Let's walk through setting up an MCP panel on each platform.
MSFS 2024 + PMDG 737
Time Required: 5-10 minutes
Steps:
- Connect panel via USB
- Launch MSFS 2024
- Load PMDG 737
- Open PMDG Settings → Hardware
- Enable Hardware MCP
- Load manufacturer profile
- Done—start flying
Troubleshooting:
- If panel not detected, rescan in MSFS Controls
- Check USB power if issues persist
- PMDG forums have quick answers
X-Plane 12 + Zibo 737
Time Required: 30-60 minutes
Steps:
Troubleshooting:
- Check DataRef names in DataRefTool
- Verify axis assignments
- Community forums and Discord help
The Verdict
MSFS wins decisively on configuration simplicity. Profile-based setup means you're flying in minutes, not hours.
X-Plane requires more technical knowledge but offers more customization flexibility.
Performance Impact
Hardware panels have minimal performance impact, but let's compare baseline requirements.
System Requirements
MSFS 2024 Minimum (with hardware):
- CPU: Intel i7-10700K or AMD Ryzen 7 5800X
- GPU: RTX 3070 or RX 6800
- RAM: 32GB recommended
- Storage: NVMe SSD required
- Internet: 25+ Mbps recommended
X-Plane 12 Minimum (with hardware):
- CPU: Intel i5-8400 or AMD Ryzen 5 3500
- GPU: GTX 1070 or RX 5700
- RAM: 16GB minimum
- Storage: SSD recommended
- Internet: Not required
Frame Rate Impact
USB polling for hardware panels is negligible on both platforms:
| Configuration | MSFS 2024 | X-Plane 12 |
|---|---|---|
| No panels | 45 FPS | 60 FPS |
| MCP + EFIS | 45 FPS | 60 FPS |
| Full cockpit (6+ panels) | 44 FPS | 59 FPS |
Tested on i9-13900K, RTX 4080, 1440p, high settings
Winner: X-Plane 12 for lower requirements, equivalent panel impact
Community and Support
MSFS 2024
Official Support:
- Microsoft/Asobo forums
- Zendesk support tickets
- Regular developer Q&As
Community:
- Massive user base
- Active Discord servers
- YouTube tutorial abundance
- r/flightsim subreddit
Hardware-Specific:
- Dedicated hardware forums
- Manufacturer support (including ours)
- FSUIPC community
- MobiFlight Discord
X-Plane 12
Official Support:
- Laminar Research forums
- Direct developer access
- Open bug tracker
Community:
- Dedicated, technical user base
- x-plane.org forums
- Active Discord servers
- Strong mod community
Hardware-Specific:
- Threshold forums
- FlyWithLua community
- Plugin developer support
- DIY cockpit builders network
Winner: MSFS 2024 for volume, X-Plane for technical depth
Which Platform Should You Choose?
Choose MSFS 2024 If...
You want the easiest setup:
- Profile-based configuration
- Native hardware detection
- Better documentation
- Commercial support options
You prioritize visuals:
- Photorealistic scenery
- Real-world weather
- Live traffic integration
- Streaming-ready presentation
You fly PMDG or Fenix:
- Best-in-class hardware support
- Dedicated configuration tools
- Official manufacturer profiles
You're new to flight simulation:
- Lower learning curve
- More intuitive interface
- Larger tutorial ecosystem
Choose X-Plane 12 If...
You want the best flight model:
- Blade element theory
- More realistic handling
- Better ground physics
- Accurate systems simulation
You prefer open platforms:
- Free Zibo 737 (excellent)
- Plugin architecture
- No DRM restrictions
- Offline capability
You enjoy technical configuration:
- DataRef customization
- Scripting possibilities
- DIY-friendly community
- Full control over setup
You have modest hardware:
- Lower system requirements
- Runs on older PCs
- Less GPU-dependent
- No internet requirement
Dual Platform Strategy
Many serious cockpit builders use both platforms. Here's how to make it work.
Shared Hardware, Dual Profiles
Your physical panels work with both simulators:
When to Use Each Platform
Use MSFS 2024 for:
- Visual showcase flights
- Streaming and content creation
- Casual flying sessions
- Showing off your cockpit
Use X-Plane 12 for:
- Procedure practice
- Systems training
- Flight model exploration
- Offline sessions
Our Recommendation
Primary platform: MSFS 2024
For most hardware cockpit builders, MSFS 2024 offers the best overall experience:
- Faster setup
- Better integration
- More "wow factor"
- Growing ecosystem
Secondary platform: X-Plane 12 with Zibo
Keep X-Plane installed for:
- Free high-quality 737
- Offline practice
- Alternative perspective
- Flight model comparison
Future Outlook
MSFS 2024 Roadmap
Microsoft continues heavy investment:
- Enhanced SDK capabilities
- More exposed variables
- Better hardware documentation
- Partner program for manufacturers
X-Plane 12 Development
Laminar Research focuses on core simulation:
- Flight model improvements
- Plugin API updates
- VR enhancements
- Mobile companion apps
Industry Trend
The industry is consolidating around better hardware support. Both platforms recognize that serious simmers want physical controls, and development reflects this priority.
Conclusion
Both X-Plane 12 and MSFS 2024 deliver excellent hardware cockpit experiences, but they excel in different areas.
MSFS 2024 wins for ease of use, visual presentation, and integrated hardware support. If you want to connect your panels and fly within minutes, MSFS is your platform.
X-Plane 12 wins for flight dynamics, value (free Zibo), and offline capability. If you enjoy technical configuration and prioritize realistic handling, X-Plane delivers.
The good news: your hardware investment works on both platforms. CS 737X and CS 320N panels connect via standard USB and support both ecosystems with appropriate configuration.
Ready to elevate your simulation?
- Explore our Boeing 737 Series
- Discover our Airbus A320 Series
- Read our MSFS 2024 Hardware Setup Guide
Frequently Asked Questions
Q: Can I use the same hardware on both platforms?
A: Yes. All CS panels connect via USB and work with both MSFS and X-Plane. You'll need separate configuration profiles for each platform.
Q: Which platform has better VR support for hardware?
A: Both support VR, but physical hardware actually helps VR immersion on either platform—you can feel controls you can't see clearly in the headset.
Q: Is the Zibo 737 really as good as PMDG?
A: For systems depth and flight model, yes. PMDG has better hardware integration out of the box. Both are excellent for serious simulation.
Q: Do I need FSUIPC for MSFS 2024?
A: Not for basic use with PMDG or Fenix aircraft. FSUIPC adds advanced features like conditional programming and broader aircraft support.
Q: Can I transfer my MSFS profiles to X-Plane?
A: No, profiles aren't compatible. However, the learning transfers—once you understand your hardware, configuring either platform is straightforward.
Q: Which platform updates more frequently?
A: MSFS has more frequent sim updates; X-Plane aircraft (especially Zibo) often update more frequently than their MSFS counterparts.
Last updated: December 2024
Related articles: